DRT-I, Chandigarh dismissed a summary application as not maintainable because the applicant had not received the mandatory notice under Section 13(4).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/34/2023 MOHAMMAD SHAFI PARRAY Vs JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED
10.02.2023 Item No.55
Present: Sh. Sachin Rana, proxy for Aadil Manzoor Beigh, Counsel for the Applicant.
Registrar has put up this matter before me. In this SA, notice under Section 13(4) has not been received by the applicant and as such, SA is not maintainable. The same is hereby dismissed as not maintainable. File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a summary application is maintainable when notice under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act has not been received by the applicant.
Mohammad Shafi Parray
Jammu and Kashmir Bank Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
