Third party applicants challenged an e-auction sale notice issued by a bank. As the sale did not take place, the notice was infructuous; the application faced no merits and was dismissed without costs.
Sale notice challenge dismissed without costs; pending IAs closed; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.A.34 of 2023 06.02.2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 06th day of February, 2023
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K. Presiding Officer
SARFAESI APPLICATION No. 34 of 2023
2
S.A.34 of 2023 06.02.2023
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicants : M/s.S.Rajmakesh. Counsel for respondent bank : M/s M. Muthuperiasamy
ORDER
by respondent bank scheduling sale to 24.01.2023 for recovery of a sum of Rs.9,13,37,101/-.
3
S.A.34 of 2023 06.02.2023
(Dictated to PS, transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in Open Court, on this the 06th day of February, 2023)
Sd/(GANAPATHI K.R.K) PRESIDING OFFICER
C.Janarthanan
G.Shanmugam
S.Vishal
P.Senthil Kumar
S.K.Perumal
The Authorised Officer, Union Bank of India
Ganapathi K.R.K.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
