S.A. under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act was dismissed for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to file affidavit of service and both parties were absent.
S.A. dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Order Sheet( continuation) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Case No.SA/337/ |
2022 Mr Rajesh Roy & Ors. Vs. Punjab National Bank |
|
| Date of Order |
Order with signature | Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary |
| 22/06/2023 | None appears for Sarfaesi applicant. None appears for respondent bank. In earlier date also, both parties were absent. The applicant has not filed affidavit of service to proof the service of notice on the respondent bank. Hence, S.A. is dismissed for non prosecution. (AMBUJA MOHAN DAS) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-I, KOLKATA |
|
| 38/tsm |
Mr Rajesh Roy & Ors.
Punjab National Bank
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
