In an application in SA 335 of 2022, the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the matter as infructuous since counsel for both parties confirmed the entire amount had been paid, rendering no SARF action necessary.
Application dismissed as infructuous with all pending lAs if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECO\rERYTRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court
.... Office action taken with data
• • - . ""- . _ ..• ----J )ate 01 order !>rp~~edin ------""-----1• 27.06.2023
| • 27.06.2023 · '" "" ... .. |
SA 335 of2022 • Ld. counsel for the applicant has informed that the entire amount has been paid. Ld. counsel Shri Umapati Jha for the respondent also submits that the payment has been made by applicant. Insuch circumstances no SARF AESI Action required in view of the above facts. Hence the' present S. application has become infructuous. Accordingly dsmissed as infructuous alongwith all pending lAs ifany. Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. Patna (KaUSha~ y.; Presiding Officer |
|---|---|
| · '" | • T ,. |
| • | |
| .. "" .,. |
• .... |
| · .. |
• |
| '" | •.. |
| • | |
| .. | • |
| · .. |
• |
| '" | •• |
| .. | .. |
| • | |
| • "" |
• |
| .,. | -------._-----------------------j--- |
..
•
Applicant
Respondent
Kaulsha, Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
