Dismissed
suresh seshmal jain v. Union Bank of India
DRTSA/321/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
¶2
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
¶3
ORDER SHEET
¶4
13.10.2023 Sr. No.40
¶5
| SA No.321 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mr. Suresh Seshmal Jain Vs Union Bank of India & Ors. |
| None for the applicant. Ms Pradnya Bamne i/b Mr Nainesh Amin – Advocate for defendants. |
||
| 1. On 6thOctober 2023, no representation was made by the applicant and therefore, the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no representation is made by the applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, Securitisation Application No.321 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
¶6
Radhika
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Suresh Seshmal Jain
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
AI extract
Presiding Officer
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court