vinodkumar kothari v. Union Bank of India
DRTSA/318/2022
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
¶2
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
¶3
ORDER SHEET
¶4
13.10.2023 Sr. No.39
¶5
| SA No.318 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mr. Vinodkumar Kothari Vs Union Bank of India & Ors. |
| None for the applicant. Ms Pradnya Bamne i/b Mr Nainesh Amin – Advocate for defendants. |
||
| 1. On 6thOctober 2023, no representation was made by the applicant and therefore, the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no representation is made by the applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, Securitisation Application No.318 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
¶6
Radhika
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court