Shri Vikram Singh v. Iifl Home Finance Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Special Appeal was dismissed in default for non-prosecution as neither the applicant nor any counsel appeared before the Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/31612022
SHRI VIKRAM SINGH Vs IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED
1r.10.2023
Item no.48
Present: None for applicant
Sh. Mukul Bhimani, Counsel for respondent FI
Matter is taken through V.C.
None appeared on the last date of hearing on behalf of the applicant. None appears today. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to record room.
z.<. q*)€
(SUSHIL KUMtrR RASTOGI)
PRESIDING OFFICE&
DRT-II, DeIhi
c
SHRI VIKRAM SINGH
IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court