Misplaced application dismissed as withdrawn after applicant's counsel stated the respondent bank had approved the original time schedule proposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/312/2023 MS GANGA DUTT AND SONS Vs. JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED
11.12.2023 Item No.50
Present: Sh. Gurnam Singh, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.Vivek Verma & Sh.Sanjay Sagar, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr.Verma has filed reply to SA.
Mr.Gurnam Singh, counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the Bar that bank has approved the OTS proposal submitted by the applicant. In view of this, he does not want to pursue the present SA. Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Ms Ganga Dutt and Sons
Jammu and Kashmir Bank Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
