Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Kusum Aggarwal versus Deustche Bank — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2023)

Home
DRT
2023
Kusum Aggarwal versus Deustche BankKusum Aggarwal v. Deustche Bank

Dismissed

Kusum Aggarwal v. Deustche Bank

DRT18 Oct 2023SA/311/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

SA dismissed in default by Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Delhi due to non-appearance of applicant.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi

sA/311 12022 KUSUM AGGARWAL VS DEUSTCHE BANK

18.10.2023

Item no.37

Present:

None for applicant

Ms. Pratisha Devi, Counsel for respondent bank

Matter is taken through V.C.

None appeared on the last date of hearing on behalf of^the applicant. None appears today. It appears that^the applicants are not interested in^pursuing the^{case. Hence,} the present SA is dismissed in default for^{non-prosecution.}

File be consigned to records.

E-'

(SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICE& DRT-II, DCIhi

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
Kusum Aggarwal
respondent
Deutsche Bank

Coram

AI extract

SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: DRT
Decided on: 18 Oct 2023 · October
Case no.: SA/311/2022
CNR: 070120016852022

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

Cite this judgement

Kusum Aggarwal v. Deustche Bank, SA/311/2022 (DRT), decided on 18 October 2023.

The Debt Recovery Tribunals publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Special Appeal filed before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Delhi was dismissed in default for non-prosecution as the applicant neither appeared on the last date of hearing nor on the subsequent date, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the case.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

c

Topic

Banking and Recovery