S.A. No. 31 of 2023 was dismissed as withdrawn after the applicant's counsel submitted an OTS proposal to the respondent bank and decided not to pursue the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/31/2023 MS STARK INDUSTRIES Vs BANK OF BARODA (DENA BANK)
16.11.2023 Item No.85
Present: Sh. Viren Sibal, Counsel for the Applicant.
Sh. KPS Dhillon, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Viren Sibal, has made a statement at the Bar that he has submitted an OTS proposal with the bank. In view of this, he does not want to pursue the present SA and the same is hereby
dismissed as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
MS STARK INDUSTRIES
BANK OF BARODA (DENA BANK)
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
