Rakesh Kumar Garg v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Applications before DRT-I Chandigarh were dismissed in default since the applicant failed to appear despite multiple adjournments.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/31/2022 RAKESH KUMAR GARG Vs HDFC BANK
21.07.2023 Item No.60
Present: None for the Applicant. Ms. Neetu Singh, proxy Counsel for Sh. Yashvir, Counsel for the respondent bank.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rakesh Kumar Garg
- respondent
HDFC Bank
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court