Dismissed
Ms Kuber Enterprises v. Punjab National Bank
DRTSA/306/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET
¶2
PAGE No
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| sA306/2 26110123 |
NonefortheApPlicant Shri Adamya Bajpai,AdvfortheResponden |
||
| Respondent Counselbyinvitingattention last order dated10i10/23 submitsthat onI dateofhearingalso noone appearedonbeh of Applicants. |
n t lf |
||
| Onperusalofordeldated10/10123itreve thatduetononappearanceofApplicantsi thismatterhadbeenadjoumeil\v peremptoryorderer.'enthenApplicantside absenttoday. |
ls is e h |
||
| From the conductofApplicantitreveals Applicantshavenointeresttoprosccutet SA further. |
at IS |
||
| Hencethis SAisbeingdismissedforwant prosecution. Boththepartiesshallbeartheirowncost. Recordbeconsigned tothe recordroom' (Ram rwas Patel) PresidinsOfficer D.ll.T,.Iabalpur (M.P&C.G) |
of |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
None
- respondent
Respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court