DATE DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER shows that the Applicants should have got knowledge about passing the order dated 21t02123 afier issuins norice clarcrl 25 05123 thcn only cause ol'action has becn arised to challenge the orclcr thcn only need has arises to file application for amendment. 9. l-ookin,rl to alillcsuicl r.ncntioncd lact in opinion of this []cnch bar pror idccl rrndcr order 2 rule 2 ol'Cl'}C get not attlacted in this nlatler. 10. It is settlccl plincipal that firct ariscs dLrc to subsequent event can be challengcd through anrendment on pencling pctition. I L Therefbre IA N o.23 40 123 appl ication lor amendment anci lA No.2339i 23 is hcreby' allowed. Whatsoever delal' has been occasion is heleby condoned. ll. Applicants lrlc ltcrntittcd to carrr oLtt anrendnrent unclcl the Si\ todal itscll' belbrc 1he court master ol'this Bench. li. So fhr application lbr grant ol' sral is concerned sincc u'ith c()nsensus ol' both the side this rratter is bcing disposed o1' linally therefbre this stay application shall also be dccided with flnal order. 14. Applicant C'ounscl b1, inviting attention on order dated 27102123 submits that approx Its.15,58,930/- is oLrtstanding against the Applicants and thc Altplicants arc leacll to deposit the saicl arn()unt rvithin lirLrr ntonths u,ith fbur equal installntent and also has
