Dismissed
Rajesh Vastralaya v. Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank
DRTSA/28/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Date (.order or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
|---|---|
| SA 28 of2023 | |
| 15.04.2023 | It has been informed that the present S. application has been filed for challenging the auction sale but the auction sale could not take palace. Hence this S. application has become infructuous. Accordingly the S. application is dismissed as infructuous with all pending lAs if any. Interim order if any stands vacated. |
| Patna Il:/ (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. |
| Office | action |
|---|---|
| taken w | ith data |
Kaushalendra Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court