The Tribunal disposed of a Securitization Application after granting leave to the applicant to withdraw the application subject to the outcome of a filed petition. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
17.08.2023
Sr. No.11
| SA No.278 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Ramka Silk House Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs Bank of India & Ors. |
| Mr Sunil Humbre – Advocate for the applicant. Ms Dhanshri Wakchaure i/b Mr O.A. Das – Advocate for defendant no.1. None for other defendants. |
||
| 12 | 1. Mr Humbre, representing the applicants, has filed puris (exhibit-12), which is taken on record. By the pursis, the applicant seeks the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Securitization Application with liberty to file fresh subject to outcome of the Section 94 petition. Leave granted. 2. In view of the statement made in the pursis (exhibit- 12), Securitization Application No.278 of 2023 stands disposed of with no order as to costs. |
|
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Ramka Silk House Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Bank of India & Ors.
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
