This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
01.12.2023
Sr. No.31
| SA No.277 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
M/s. Pratiksha Enterprises & Ors. Vs. Bank of Maharashtra & Ors. |
| None for the applicants. | ||
| Ms Dimple Tejani i/b M/s. M & S Legal Ventures – Advocates for defendants. |
||
| 1. On 10thNovember 2023, no representation was made by the applicants and therefore, the matter is listed |
||
| under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no |
||
| representation is made by the applicants either personally or through the advocate. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, Securitisation Application |
||
| No.277 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. 2. All pending Interlocutory Applications stands disposed of. Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
M/s. Pratiksha Enterprises & Ors.
Bank of Maharashtra & Ors.
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
