In this special appeal filed under the SARFAESI Act, the bank counsel stated the debt action had been withdrawn. The applicant declined to pursue the appeal in light of this. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
The special appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/273/2023 SH SUSHIL THAKUR Vs HIMACHAL PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
25.10.2023 Item No.65
Present: Sh. Vivek Verma, proxy for Sh.KPS Dhillon, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.RS Bhatia, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr.Bhatia, counsel for respondent bank has made a statement at the Bar that the bank has withdrawn the SARFAESI action in this case. Mr.Verma, counsel for the applicant states that in view of the statement made by counsel for the respondent bank, he does not want to pursue the present SA. Accordingly, the SA is dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Sh Sushil Thakur
Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank
A S Narang
Manoj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
