Kanwar Uday Singh v. Canara Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/265/2022 KANWAR UDAY SINGH Vs CANARA BANK
08.02.2023 Item No.78
Present: Sh. Abhinav Bali, proxy for Sh.Shailender Kashyap, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.RS Bhatia, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr.Bhatia states that applicant has deposit Rs.51 lacs in home loan account and also produced no due certificate. In view of this, counsel for the applicant does not want to pursue the present case. The same is hereby dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kanwar Uday Singh
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court