Dismissed
Ashish Kumar v. Canara Bank
DRTSA/261/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Sale application dismissed as infructuous; all pending applications and interim orders set aside.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| • Date of order or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with data |
|---|---|---|
| SA 261 of 2022 | ||
| 15.04.2023 | Ithas been informed by the parties the sale which has been challenge in the S. application but sale could not take place. Hence this S. application has become infructuous. Accordingly the S. application is dismissed as infructuous alongwith all pending lAs if any. Interim order if any stands vacated Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. Patna (Kaushalendra Yadav Presiding Officer |
Coram
AI extract
Kaushalendra Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · P.o
- Order 2 — this page · P.o
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court