Dismissal of a Special Appeal due to the applicant's absence after being served a peremptory order warning dismissal for want of prosecution.
Special Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | RE]',ARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA245l 0U05123 ') |
NonefortheApplicant Shri Adamya Bajpai,AdvfortheRespondenl Onmatter being taken Respondent Counselb! invitingattention on orderdated03/03/23anc 26104123submitsthatfbrsevclalhearingsnc oneappearedonbehalfofthc Applicantanc praysfordismissalofthisSAsince peremptoryorderhasalreadybeenpassed. |
|
| Onperusaloforderdated26104123itreveals thatlookingtoearlierabsenccofthe Applicantsidebypassingperemptoryorderit hasbeen mentionedthatifonnextdateol hearingalsonooneappearedonbehalfofthe Applicant thenmattershallbedismissedfor wantofprosecutioneventhennoon( appearedtoday.Thereforeforwantol prosecutionthisSAis beingdisrnissed. |
||
| Recordbeconsigned to the recordroom. (RamNiu'asI'}atel) Presidin Officer D.R.T,Jabalpur (M.P&C.G) |
Applicant
Respondent
Ram Niyawas Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
