Bandana Printers v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Orders the dismissal and disposal of the applicant petition and pending interim applications as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties, resulting in full and final settlement of dues.
What did the court decide?
The instant SA and other pending IAs are disposed of in the category of dismissed as withdrawn as settled.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
| Page No.- |
Order Sheet( continuation) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Case NO. SA | /244/2022 BANDANA PRINTERS Vs. UCO BANK |
|
| Date of the order |
Order with signature | Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary |
| 14/06/202 3 |
Ld. Advocate, Ms. Bandana Sarkar appears for the Applicant and presses the withdrawal petition, bearing application no. IA/1056/2023. |
|
| Ld. Advocate, Ms. Rituparna Saha appears for the Respondent Bank. In the above said application it was stated that the Applicant has filed an application being aggrieved by the action of the bank. During pendency of the Recovery Proceedings there has been a settlement between the parties and the Bank has received full and final settlement of the dues. Hence, they do not want to proceed with the case. This application is affirmed by the Applicant and his signature is identified by Advocate on record. In view of this, no prejudice will be caused to the SA Respondent if their response is dispensed with in this IA. This instant SA and any other pending IAs are disposed of in the category of dismissed as withdrawn as settled. IA/1055/2023 is moved which is a put up application. Since the record is put up, the IA/1055/2023 is disposed of. (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer |
AD
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
AD
Parties & counsel
- applicant
BANDANA PRINTERS
- respondent
UCO BANK
Coram
Ambuja Mohan Das
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court