The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an application seeking permission to withdraw a case after the applicant informed that the account had been closed under a compromise; the application was dismissed as withdrawn with pending loans vacated.
S. application dismissed as withdrawn; pending LAs vacated; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA | ||
|---|---|---|
| Date of order or proceeding |
Order with the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with dat> |
| SA 23 of2022 | ||
| 04.05.2023 | Ld. counsel for applicant has informed that the account in question has been closed under the compromise and he seeks permission to withdraw the case. Accordingly the S. application is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith all. pending lAs if any. Interim order if any stands vacated. |
|
| Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. | ||
| Patna (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer |
..
applicant
Kaushalendra Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
