The application was dismissed in default as neither the applicant nor the respondent appeared, and the applicant had not pursued the matter after multiple calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/229/2022 HARINDER SINGH Vs SHRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
20.01.2023 Item No.76
Present: None for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 3:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Harinder Singh
Shriram Housing Finance Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
