This single-line order in a sanctity of service application before DRT-I Chandigarh dismissed the case by default due to the non-appearance of the applicant despite repeated adjournments.
Application dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/224/2023 GAGANDEEP SINGH Vs PUNJAB AND SIND BANK
15.11.2023 Item No.58
Present: None for the Applicant. None for respondent bank.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a S.A. filed in a DRT is to be dismissed in default for the non-appearance of the applicant?
Will the court allow a defaulting applicant to stage an appearance?
GAGANDEEP SINGH
PUNJAB AND SIND BANK
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
