Single line order disposing of a Sanad Application challenging an auction fixed in a disputes involving PNB. The application was rendered misconceived due to a subsequent statement by the applicant regarding no bids received, and was disposed of accordingly.
Application disposed of as no bid was received. File consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/222/2023 SH. DAVINDER SINGH VS. PNB
12.12.2023 Item No.34
Present: Sh. HP Singh, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.CS Pasricha, Counsel for respondent No.1/Bank. Ms.Deepshikha Gupta, Counsel for respondent No.2 to 8 (On VC).
Mr.Pasricha states that in this SA applicant had challenged the auction fixed for 01.09.2023. However, on 02.09.2023, he had made a statement that no bid has been received. In view of this, nothing survives in the present SA. The same is disposed of . File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Sh. Davinder Singh
PNB
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
