Shri Adishakti v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal ordered disposal of a Securitisation Application as it was settled with full payment made by the applicant, thereby closing the account.
What did the court decide?
Securitisation Application disposed of as settled; all pending interlocutory applications disposed off.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 0 S |
6.09.2 r. No. |
023 33 SA No. 220/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No. 220/2022 Shri Adishakti ..Applicant Versus HDFC Bank Ltd. ..Respondent None for the applicant. Mr. U.N.Shete – Advocate for the respondent bank The matter is taken through VC/hybrid. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that the compromise took place between the parties and the entire amount of settlement has been paid by the applicant as full and final and account is closed. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent bank request to dispose of the Securitisation Application. |
||
| 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order : ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.220/2022 stands disposed of as settled. |
||
| B. Accordingly, all Interlocutory Applications pending if any stands disposed off. |
||
| C. Consign the file to the Record Room. The parties may download the order from the official web-site. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK] (SA No.220/2022) Page 1 of 1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shri Adishakti
- respondent
HDFC Bank Ltd.
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court