In an SA/204/2022, the Applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls. The Presiding Officer dismissed the application in default.
Application dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/204/2022 RAJWINDER KAUR Vs ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED
16.05.2023 Item No.62
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh.Manav Singal, proxy for Sh.DK Singal, Counsel for respondent bank.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Rajwinder Kaur
ICICI Home Finance Company Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
