The special application was dismissed as withdrawn after the respondent bank filed a statement at the bar withdrawing the possession notice, leading the petitioner to abandon the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/2/2023 MS CHAND TRADING COMPANY Vs JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED
25.04.2023 Item No.84
Present: Sh. Shrey Vasudev, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.Gaurav Thakur, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr.Gaurav Thakur has made a statement at the bar that bank has withdrawn the possession notice. Mr.Vasudev has made a statement at the bar that in view of the statement made by counsel for respondent bank, he does not want to pursue the present SA. Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn . File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
MS CHAND TRADING COMPANY
JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
