In an application under DRT where the applicant failed to appear on the scheduled date, the Presiding Officer dismissed the application in default due to lack of active pursuit of the matter.
Application dismissed in default
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/9/2022 RAJ KUMAR Vs CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
01.12.2023 Item No.58
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh.Gulshan Mehta, proxy for Sh.CS Pasricha, Counsel for respondent bank.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Raj Kumar
Central Bank of India
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
