Securitisation Application No.3 of 2022 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to make representations.
Securitisation Application No.3 of 2022 dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
13.10.2023 Sr. No.36
| SA No.3 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Ardent Maschinfabrik Pvt. Ltd. Vs HDFC Bank |
| None for the parties. | ||
| 1. On 6thOctober 2023, no representation was made by the applicant and therefore, the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no representation is made by the applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, |
||
| Securitisation Application No.3 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Ardent Maschinfabrik Pvt. Ltd.
HDFC Bank
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
