This order on a request for withdrawal of a Debt Recovery Tribunal application allowed the withdrawal as the matters were amicably settled and the loan account was closed.
Application dismissed as withdrawn after the matter was settled and loan account closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts RecoveryTribunal-Il,Delhi
sA/ 201 I 2023
GARIMANhAS AND VS STATEBANKOF INDIA
LL.t2.2023
Item no. 39
Present: Mr. ApoorvSinghal, Counsel for applicant' Mr. PradeepDhaka, counsel for respondentbank,
Matter is takenthroughVideo Conferencing'
The Ld. counselfor applicant submits that the matterhas been settledand loan account has been closed. He requested for withdrawalof the PresentSA'
Request allowed
In view ofthe above submissionmade by the ld. counsel for applicant,sA 2oLl2O23 is dismissed as withdrawn, being amicablYsettled.
File be consignedto records
q,
(SUSHIL KUMACRASTOGI) PRESIDINGOFFICER, DRT-II,Delhi
GARIMA NHAS
STATE BANK OF INDIA
SUSHIL KUMAR CRAFTSTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
