The applicant sought settlement of a matter. At the hearing, counsel stated that the matter was settled and the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application, which was then dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/200/2022 PARAMJIT KAUR Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA
26.04.2023 Item No.95
Present: Sh. Paramjit Singh, proxy for Sh.NS Sidhu, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Mr. Paramjit Singh, has made a statement at the bar that the matter has been settled between the parties and he does not want to pursue this application. Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn . File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Paramjit Kaur
State Bank of India
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
