Default dismissal order. The applicant did not appear on the last hearing date nor today. The tribunal dismissed the appeal in default for non-prosecution.
No relief granted. Appeal dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovely Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAlL92l2022
MR JAGDISH CHAND SURROACH Vs INDIAN BANK
17.10.2023
Item no.53
Present: None for applicant Sh. Gaurav Verma, Counsel for respondent bank
Matter is taken through V.C.
None appeared on the last date of hearing on behalf of the applicant. None appears today. It appears that the applicants are not interested inpursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
T,
(SUSHIL KUMAR RASIOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
c
MR JAGDISH CHAND SURROACH
INDIAN BANK
SUSHIL KUMAR RASIOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
