Application under SARFAESI Act was disposed of as infructuous since notices were issued to a deceased person and replaced with fresh ones.
Securitisation Application and pending interlocutory applications disposed off as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 2 S |
7.03.2 r. No. |
023 57 SA No.172/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.172/2022 | ||
| Mateen Ismail Siddiqui Prop of M/s. Sun Shine Enterprises ..Applicant Versus Edel Weiss Housing Finance Ltd. ..Respondent None for the applicant. Mr. Anirudha S. Pathak – Advocate for the respondent. The matter is taken through VC. 1. The learned counsel for the respondent-company submits that the main contention in the Securitisation Application was that the notices have been issued to a dead person. The respondent has dropped the said notice and has issued a fresh notice. 2. In these circumstances, the Securitisation Application has become infructuous and disposed off accordingly. |
||
| 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.172/2022 stands disposed off as has become infructuous. B. All the pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed off. |
||
| C. File be consigned to the record room. | ||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.172/2022) Page 1 of 1
Mateen Ismail Siddiqui
Edel Weiss Housing Finance Ltd.
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
