Dismissed
Satish Jayant Khoda v. Hdfc Bank
DRTSA/167/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court dismissed the Securitisation Application upon clarification that the matter had been amicably settled between the parties, dismissing it with no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
Securitisation Application No.167 of 2023 dismissed with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
¶2
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
¶3
ORDER SHEET
¶4
26.05.2023
¶5
Sr. No.35
¶6
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
SA No.167 of 2023 Mr Satish Jayant Khoda & Ors. Vs. HDFC Bank Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Mr Mohit C. Shamdasani – Advocate for the applicants. | ||
| Mr Shadab Khan i/b M/s. PMH Law – Advocates for defendants. |
||
| 1. The learned counsel for the parties submits that the Securitisation Application can be dismissed as the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. |
||
| Based on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, Securitisation Application No.167 of 2023 stands dismissed with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
¶7
Nidhi
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Mr Satish Jayant Khoda & Ors.
- respondent
HDFC Bank Ltd.
Coram
AI extract
Presiding Officer
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court