In an application for securities, the applicant did not appear. The applicant expressed lack of interest in continuing the matter. The court dismissed the application for non-prosecution.
Securitisation Application No.163/2022 dismissed for non-prosecution; pending IAs disposed of accordingly; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 22. Sr. |
05.20 No.2 |
23 2 SA No.163/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.163/2022 | ||
| M/s. Nazarkar Polyfilms ..Applicant Versus Canara Bank ..Respondent None for the applicant. Mr. P. N. Kapadia – Advocate for the respondent. The matter is taken through Video Conference. |
||
| 1. In this matter none appears for the applicant. Even after pass over none appears for the applicant. 2. It appears that the applicants are not interested in continuing with the matter. |
||
| 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.163/2022 stands dismissedfor non-prosecution. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. Interim orders if any also stands vacated. C. File be consigned to the record room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.163/2022) Page 1 of 1
M/s. Nazarkar Polyfilms
Canara Bank
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
