Smt Anshu Rani v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-line order dismissing service application for redemption because conditional deposit ordered on 27.06.2023 was not made by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/150/2023 SMT ANSHU RANI Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
27.07.2023 Item No.48
Present: Sh. Yogesh Kumar, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh. CS Pasricha, Counsel for respondent bank. Sh. Arun Dogra, Counsel for respondent No.2.
Mr. Yogesh Kumar, counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the bar that as per the order dated 27.06.2023 the money has not been deposited. The order dated 27.06.2023 was conditional to the extent that in case the money is not deposited, the SA for redumption shall be deemed to have been dismissed. In view of this, SA is dismissed .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Anshu Rani
Punjab National Bank
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court