Mr Dedavat Jaymangal Tejmal v. Hdfc Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Application disposed of as the respondent financial institution withdrew SARFAESI actions after regularizing the account, leaving no substantive issue for adjudication.
Application disposed of as the respondent financial institution withdrew SARFAESI actions after regularizing the account, leaving no substantive issue for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 13/04/2023 | Ex. No. |
Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in SA 14 of 2023 Mr Dedavat Jaymangal Tejmal Vs HDFC Limited |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate Mr. Jaymangal J. Dedavat and Advocate Mr. G.R. Jadhav appeared for the Applicant. Advocate Mr. R.L. Motwani appeared for the Respondent. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent Financial Institution inform that impugned account is already regularised therefore, now nothing survive in the present SA. Ld. Counsel for the Applicant has also conceded the same however submits that there are some issues which to be resolve regarding the penal interest and other. Since, admittedly account is regularised and as such the Respondent F.I. has already withdrawn all the actions under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 therefore now nothing survive in the present SA and hence same is |
|||
| hereby disposed off accordingly. |
File be close and consigned to record room. P.O. DRT-I
Sgj/-20
Mr Dedavat Jaymangal Tejmal
HDFC Limited
Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court