The Debt Recovery Tribunal, Patna dismissed Section 34 application as infructuous on 20.02.2023 because the account had been settled and the applicant lost interest due to compromise.
Application dismissed as infructuous; pending applications dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Office action taken with data
| Date of order or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
|---|---|
| SA 129of2022 | |
| 20.02.2023 | None is present for applicant. Ld. counsel for the respondent has informed that he has been orally instructed on behalf of the respondent bank that the account has been settled. Itappears in the above circumstances that the applicant has lost interest in the matter on the account of compromise. Hence, the S. application is dismissed as infructuous alongwith all pending lAs if any. Interim order if any stands vacated. Consign the record. Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website Patna (KaUShale~ Yadav Presiding Officer |
Applicant
Respondent Bank
Kaushale Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
