The applicant sought to pursue Sale Application No. 123/2022 agreeing to a compromise. The Presiding Officer dismissed the application as withdrawn based on counsel's statement.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/123/2022 M/s Tejaswi Steel Rolling Mills Vs. SBI
12.01.2023 Item No.77
Present: Ms.Deepshikha Gupta, proxy for Sh.Aalok Jagga, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.RK Jindal, Counsel for respondent bank.
File taken up today on the request made by counsel for the parties as OA No.2008/2021 is fixed up for today. Counsel for the parties state that this SA be also taken up today. Ms.Deepshikha Gupta, counsel for the applicant states that in view of the compromise, she does not want to pursue the present SA. Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
M/s Tejaswi Steel Rolling Mills
SBI
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
