Application for securitisation dismissed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad for non-prosecution as the applicant was absent from the hearing.
Securitisation Application No.119/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution; file consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 1 S |
3.06.2 r. No. |
023 22 SA No.119/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.119/2022 | ||
| Uttam Ananda Lavhale ..Applicant Versus SBFC Finance Limited ..Respondent None for the applicant. The matter is taken through VC/hybrid. 1. In this matter the applicant was absent on 26thJuly, 2022, 13thDecember, 2022 and 17thMay, 2023. |
||
| 2. Today also none appears for the applicants. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. |
||
| ORDER | ||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.119/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. |
||
| C. File be consigned to the record room. | ||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.119/2022) Page 1 of 1
Uttam Ananda Lavhale
SBFC Finance Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
