The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed Securitization Application No. 115/2023 (Dhiraj Traders vs. Maharashtra Gramin Bank) for non-prosecution, disposing of related interlocutory applications via video conference.
Securitization Application No. 115/2023 dismissed for non-prosecution; all interlocutory applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 09.1 Sr. |
1.202 No.87 |
3 SA No.115/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No. 115/2023 Dhiraj Traders ..Applicants Versus Maharashtra Gramin Bank ..Respondent Mr. R.R.Bangar – Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. J.R.Kalyankar – Advocate for respondent bank The matter is taken through Video Conference/hybrid. 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that his client is not responding and he is not receiving the instruction. |
||
| 2. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.115/2023 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. Accordingly, all the Interlocutory Applications stand disposed off. |
||
| C. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK] (SA No.115/2023) Page 1 of 1
Maharashtra Gramin Bank
Dhiraj Traders
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
