Munshi Lal Jain and Ors. v. Yes Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\ 14!''rrF--
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/lls 12022 MUNSHI LAL JAIN AND ORS VS YES BANK
29.tL.2023
Item no. 38
Present: None for applicant
Sh. Shubham, Counsel for respondent bank
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing.
None appeared on the last date ofhearingon behalf of the applicant. Despite issuance of defaultnotice noneappears today. It appears that the applicantsare not interestedin pursuing the case. Hence, thepresent SA is dismissedin default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
q)Yz (susHrL KUMAfi. RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICE& DRT-II, Delhi
c
Parties & counsel
- applicant
MUNSHI LAL JAIN AND ORS
- respondent
YES BANK
Coram
NARESH KUMAR RASTOGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court