Application dismissed as withdrawn by mutual consent. The matter was settled between parties.
Application set down as withdrawn
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
a
*1
Debts Recovety Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAlLu2O23 GMK PLASTO VISION PRIVATE LIMITED Vs KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
27.L0.2023
Item no. 04
Present: Mohd. Ali, Counsel for applicant Sh. SK Garg, Counsel for respondent bank
?
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing.
The Ld. counsel for the respondent bank and sA appticant submit that the matter has been settted between the pafties and the respondent bank has filed an application for withdrawal in the connected OA.
The Ld. counsel for appticant submitted that he wish to withdraw the present matter.
In view of the above submission the present sA is issed as withdrawn.
be consigned to record room.
u\ (susHrl KUMAR RASTOGT) PRESIDING OFFICE& DRT-II, Delhi
GMK PLASTO VISION PRIVATE LIMITED
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
