Priyanka Nand v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed the present Statutory Application in default for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite a default notice.
What did the court decide?
The application is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
Debts RecoveryTribunal-Il,Delhi
:r i
sA/ 108 I 2023 PRIYANKANAND VS INDIAN BANK
tL.L2.2023
Item no.47
Present: None for aPPlicant.
Ms. Sweety Sood,Counsel for respondent bank'
Matter istaken throughVideo Conferencing'
None appearedon the last date of hearingon behalf of the applicant.Despite issuance of default notice none appears today. Itappearsthat the applicantsare not interestedin pursuing the case.Hence,the presentsA is dismissedin default fornon-Prosecution.
File be consignedto records.
4.i (SUSHIL KUMARRASTOGI) PRESIDINGOFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Priyanka Nand
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court