Uco Bank v. Bahadur Singh
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/845/2022 UCO BANK Vs BAHADUR SINGH
20.04.2023 Item No.28
Present: Sh. Sahil Goyal, proxy for Sh.VK Gupta, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendant.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Ms.Gursimran Kaur, and has made a statement at the bar that defendant has paid the overdue amount of Rs.22,99,600/- and account stands regularized and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is
dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
UCO BANK
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court