In recovery of dues from the defendant. The defendant remained absent. The court found the evidence sufficient and held the defendant liable to pay the principal amount with interest and costs.
Defendant directed to pay Rs. 29,56,666/- with future interest @8.30% p.a. and costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT HYDERABAD DATED THIS THE 24th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
PRESENT: SH. RAMESHWAR KOTHE, B.COM, L.LB, (HONS.), M.A. PRESIDING OFFICER
ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 673 OF 2022
State Bank of India, S14ECC, Patny, Secunderabad Represented by its Chief Manager
....Applicant.
Versus
Mr. Janga Reddy Mandadi, S/o. I"l. Swami Reddy Age: Major; Occ: Business H.No. 4-9-733/2, Plot No. 62, Lectureres Colony. Shanthinikethan School, Hayath Nagar, Hyderabad, Rangareddy, ....Defendant. Telangana-50150
Counsel for the Applicant : Flr. K. AnoopKumar Defendants : Exparte.
O-B-D-E-R
2
oa.No,673l2022
whether the Applicant Bank is entitled for the claim made in the OA against the Defendant?
3 oA,NO.673l2022
//aw-.o,, fi,2../**xt (RAMESHWAR KOTHE) PRESIDING OFFICER
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled to the claim made in the Original Application against the Defendant?
State Bank of India, S14ECC, Patny, Secunderabad
Rameshwar Kothé
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
