The tribunal allowed an interlocutory application for withdrawal of a bank recovery application after the parties amicably settled the matter. Consequently, the main original application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the Original Application; the Application is dismissed as withdrawn with refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.29
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1488 of 2023 In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION
NO.543 of 2022
Bank of Maharashtra
… Applicant
Versus
M/s. Vennus Bioceuticals Pvt. Ltd. … Defendant
Ms Dhanshri Wakchaure i/b Mr O.A. Das – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 6th December 2023.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
06.12.2023
Sr. No.29
| OA No.543 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Bank of Maharashtra Vs. M/s. Vennus Bioceuticals Pvt. Ltd. |
| Ms Dhanshri Wakchaure i/b Mr O.A. Das – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order in Interlocutory Application No.1488 of 2023 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.1488 of 2023, Original Application No.543 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Bank of Maharashtra
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
