Disposed
Icici Bank Limited v. Chandrama
DRTOA/533/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
PAGE No
¶2
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| oAs33/ 03nU23 3 |
ShriVedantAgrawal,AdvfortheApplicant NonefortheDefendant |
||
| Matteristakenup forhearingon No.538l/23applicationforwithdrawala refundofcourtfee. |
A d |
||
| ApplicantCounselbyinvitingattention affidavitofVneet Bhasinsubmitsthatthetti Managerhasfiledaffidavitinsupport application. |
n n of |
||
| Onperusalofcontentsofapplicationitreve that throughamicablysettlementloandispr has been settledandDefendantshasalrea depositedRs.27,20,000/-asfullandllr settlement. |
ls te v al |
||
| Lookingtofact that loandisputedhasalrea beensettledthereis noneedtoprosecute t OAfurther. |
v IS |
||
| Applicationisallowed. ApplicantBankispermittedtorvithdrawtl oA. OAis disposedofaswithdrawn. Registryisdirectedtorefund thecourtfee per rules. |
IS AS |
¶5
PAGE No
¶6
GONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶7
CASE No
¶8
DATE DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER REMARK
Both the parties shall bear their own cost.
Record be consigned to the record roont.
(Ram I S Patel)
Presidin Officer
D.R.T,.Iabalpur
(M.P & C.G)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- other
Shri Vedant Agrawal
- appellant
Applicant Bank
- respondent
Defendants
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court