Bank of Baroda v. Mr Dinar Leo Barros
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 26/10/2023 | Ex. No. Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in OA 492 of 2022 Bank of Baroda Vs Mr Dinar Leo Barros |
Next date |
|---|---|---|
| Advocate Bharat Sidhpura i/b M.V. Kini & Co. appeared for the Applicant. |
||
| Advocate Shubham H. i/b Srirai Menon appeared for the Defendant. 1. Ld. Counsel for the Defendant informs that account is already settled in August 2020, the amount has already deposited as settled. Further, the bank has already issued NOC therefore, he submits that now nothing survives in the present OA. 2. Ld. Counsel for the Applicant of OA submits that account was transferred to the other branch and now the Manager is also transferred and the branch is |
||
| under renovation. Therefore, he has no instructions regarding the settlement and therefore, seeks adjournment. 3. As informed by the Ld. Counsel for the Defendant the account is also been closed and he produced letter dated |
||
| 28/10/2020 by which it is informed that |
the account is now NIL as settled
amount is already deposited.
4. In view of the facts that account is
already closed on 28/10/2020, I do not
find any merit to continue the present
OA and therefore, the same is hereby
disposed off accordingly.
File be closed and consigned to record room.
P.O.
DRT-I
Sgj/-28
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
Mr Dinar Leo Barros
Coram
Rekha G. Dhakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court